Richmond’s Spirit & Soul Festival showcases diversity amid concerns of downtown development
on September 28, 2017
A man wearing sunglasses and an apron splattered and smeared with multicolored paint, set up a nearly 8-foot-tall wall, then laid out a vivid spectrum of acrylic paints. Soon, everyone from kids to middle-aged folks converged on this “mobile art wall,” to doodle things like flowers and smiley faces. The diversity of aspiring artists at the wall was representative of the annual Spirit & Soul Festival, where all ages and races came together in the downtown Richmond sunshine.
Alicia Gallo of Richmond Main Street Initiative (RMSI), a nonprofit with the mission to create a “robust and thriving community,” according to it’s website, organized the festival, which took place on the September 16th. With some 200 people turning out, it was one of Richmond’s larger events, comparable to the Juneteenth Parade and Festival.
Gallo said the group is working with Richmond’s residents to upend negative stereotypes that can dissuade businesses from planting roots in the city. “The perception of Richmond is that it’s a dangerous place, that it’s not a safe place, that it’s a dirty place, that it’s a very poor place,” She said while scanning the crowd. “There’s a lot of beauty down here.”
Apparently, her group’s efforts are working. During the festival, an excited Cheryl Catera handed out flyers with a smile while promoting her forthcoming coffee shop, set to open by the end of the year, on 10th Street and Macdonald Avenue.
“I honestly just wanted to pick some place new, that was up-and-coming,” said Catera of why she plans to open in downtown Richmond. She added that the city’s reputation had little bearing on her decision.
“It just seemed like a really great place, and the community is awesome, and accepting of it, so I kind of said, ‘Why not?’” she said.
A growing number of longtime residents, however, are concerned that downtown revitalization and new development efforts are setting the table for gentrification and displacement.
For instance, music and arts events in Richmond often seem like family reunions. People run into friends that they’ve known since elementary school, and reconnect with people with whom they’ve grown up alongside.
But Spirit & Soul, while diverse, also stood out as a kind of upscale event. There was a VIP section, with tickets costing upward of $25 a person, and it featured newer local businesses such as Armistice Brewing.
Some attendees said Spirit & Soul spoke to Richmond’s uncertain future. Folks certainly enjoyed the craft beer, barbecue, and kettle corn, and the inclusion of Richmond’s many nonprofits which helped make social justice a focal point of the afternoon.
Spirit & Soul served the older generation, but also featured lots of performers in their teens and early-twenties. There was a “Youth Zone,” or “The Love and Happiness Stage,” as the emcee affectionately nick-named it. Organized by community mentors and artists, the stage was a platform for young people to showcase their unique talents, including everything from group performances to a solo Hula-Hoop act.
“It’s important to have events like this to give young people something to do,” said TJ Sykes, who mentors at Richmond’s RYSE Center.
But residents remain concerned about downtown development, in addition to the newly branded Hilltop Mall (now called The Shops at Hilltop) and retail spaces near the BART station. They ask: How can Richmond’s revitalization be more inclusive?
Donnell Jones, coordinator of the Richmond Ceasefire program, which speaks out against gun violence, said the community can begin by developing “more jobs instead of housing, and develop more opportunities for our boys and girls, and men and women of color.”
When it comes to gentrification, he said there is one solution that will ensure revitalization doesn’t come to the detriment of longtime residents:
“We need to think alike, and we need to come together as a community, and address some of the issues and policies that have caused inequality in our communities,” Jones said.
2 Comments
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to richconstaff@gmail.com.
“more jobs instead of housing, and develop more opportunities for our boys and girls, and men and women of color.”
That is only going to come about by economic revitalization, gentrification, or whatever you wish to call it. People shouldn’t fear revitalization. And those pushing the fear, like the RPA, ought to be ashamed of themselves for doing so. Rather than fearing change you would do better to embrace it and get busy looking for opportunities in it.
Look at the woman in the article who is going to open a coffee shop downtown. That’s the spirit.
“more jobs instead of housing, and develop more opportunities for our boys and girls, and men and women of color.”
I understand this sentiment and agree that as development hopefully accelerates in Richmond we need to ensure that all community members benefit from economic revitalization and are protected from the negative aspects of gentrification.
However I also strongly disagree with the argument for jobs before housing. 40 years of that approach is exactly why the Bay Area is in the middle of a historic housing crisis. We will never solve the problem of displacement unless we start building massive amounts of housing for all income levels. Yes jobs at the same time but not before we solve our housing supply crisis.