Mayoral candidate’s headquarters deflates in defeat
on November 6, 2014
A crowd had formed at Nat Bates’ campaign headquarters by the time polls closed Tuesday, but the Richmond mayoral candidate was nowhere in sight.
It was 8 p.m. and Bates hadn’t been spotted all day. Neither had his friend and political ally, Councilman Corky Booze, also facing a hard-fought contest for re-election.
The supporters, assembled at the repurposed storefront on Macdonald Avenue, were still buoyant, but tired. Members of the extended Bates clan mingled with anxious attendees as they nibbled on ribs and lasagna. But the specter of the candidates’ absence hung in the air as stamina waned.
At 10:30 p.m., Booze swung the door open and entered the scrum of onlookers. A few minutes later, Bates followed, a navy blazer draped loosely over a campaign t-shirt bearing a screen-print of his face.
Amidst applause and cheers of “We want Nat!” he cut a path to a cadre of Port of Richmond employees huddled in a far corner of the room. Lucy Zhou, the port’s operations manager, patted him on the back.
“Did you take a nap?” Zhou asked.
“Yes, I took a good nap,” Bates said.
Then the 83-year-old candidate turned to face his base, many of whom had endorsed his political campaigns running back several decades.
“Where are the ballots?” he joked. “Somebody stole ‘em?”
Preliminary results had, in fact, begun to trickle in and the numbers didn’t look good. Bates’ son, Larry, was using a purple marker to circle unreported precincts on a Richmond wall map, quietly calculating the chances of an upset.
“This is halftime and we need some points,” the younger Bates said.
“A number of the black precincts are usually the last to report,” his father hedged.
Flanking the Bates men were Richmond Port Director Jim Matzorkis (“I’m here as a citizen”), Rosa Lara, President of the 23rd Street Merchants Association, Richmond Police Department Lt. Andre Hill and Sgt. Joey Schlemmer.
Asked if he had regrets about his campaign, Bates said, “I’m still in love with this city.” He said: “There was just too much mail, and people became resentful. They turned against Chevron.”
“I wanted people to understand that just because [Chevron] support[s] me, I was never their puppy,” he added.
After hours of waiting, the game’s second half came to an abrupt and decisive end at 12:30 a.m., when the results from the final 26 precincts lit the single computer monitor displaying the County Board of Election’s website.
The campaigners abandoned the scraps of cold food still on their plates. Boys clad in gear from football practice hours earlier, stopped wrestling. Someone shut off Letterman.
Bates rose to his feet as Larry finished his reading of the tally, the last of several delivered with poise throughout the evening. With all precincts in, Bates trailed with 3,818 votes to competitor Tom Butt’s 5,537.
“It looks like the campaign is over and Butt is your new mayor,” Bates conceded. “Everyone that Chevron supported was unsuccessful.”
Through its campaign committee Moving Forward, the oil giant had spent a total of $3.13 million on the election.
In a low but steady tone, Bates thanked the people in the room for their support at the polls and throughout the campaign. He pointed to poor voter turnout for the day’s disappointment, a result of the electorate’s fatigue. “Too much literature…turned a lot of people off,” he said, referencing Chevron’s barrage of campaign billboards and mailers.
At polling stations around the city, the trickle of voters had often been dwarfed by large showings of campaign activists on nearby street corners. Shields-Reid Community Center near the North Richmond border had just 17 ballots cast by 5:30 p.m.
“The African-American community doesn’t turn out unless it’s a national election,” Bates said. “There was no Obama this year.”
The Richmond Progressive Alliance’s slate had swept the local races, claiming three open city council seats for outgoing mayor Gayle McLaughlin, incumbent Jovanka Beckles, and Eduardo Martinez. And the coalition would have license to appoint a replacement for Tom Butt’s council seat when he vacated it in December. Booze had lost to up-and-comer Jael Myrick, 5,153 to 3,266.
“Nobody steps up but you and I,” Booze said, gesturing across the room to where Bates stood amidst a cluster of seated supporters, arms folded, eyes on the floor, stoic and unblinking.
“We cannot save the African-American community if they don’t want to save themselves,” Booze said. About 11,000 Richmond residents voted in the mayoral race, less than one-fourth of the city’s registered. “This is a situation where they should have stepped up to the plate.”
“I lost, [but] the community loses too, because there’s no voice. I’m the last of the voice for the community,” Booze said. “This place is turning into Berkeley, big time.”
Outside on Macdonald Avenue, where the fluorescent Bates office lit the otherwise dark thoroughfare, honking cars sped by and unleashed boisterous cheers for Tom Butt, the new mayor of Richmond.
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to email@example.com.
Too bad Nate wasn’t elected Richmond’ s new mayor.
Congratulations to Tom Butts. Now, the question is will you and
the new city council members forcus exclusively on bringing jobs and more jobs and
development and more development to Richmond, instead of fighting with Chevron, the biggest property tax payer in Richmond.
Richmond has come a long way in the last 8 years and, if no one else is grateful for the reduction in crime, a higher minimum wage, and more opportunities for formerly incarcerated people to turn their lives around, I AM GRATEFUL. But we do still have a long way to go. Let’s NOT continue to ignore the needs of those who are in ALL public housing, not just the residents of the Hacienda. Let’s also continue to advocate for keeping Doctors Hospital open, as a full-service facility.
Congratulations to Tom Butt. It will be interesting to see where his good business sense helps steer the city council. No doubt he will not cater to Chevron. He’s old school, down to earth and I just hope he can balance the ideas of creating parks that the city cannot maintain properly with green ideas that are good business moves. Parks are great if people appreciate and take care of them and want to return.
Nate Bates has wisdom, intellect an common sense, but he did not run a good, grass-roots campaign that addressed all of Richmond. Getting too close to Chevron’s epicenter was a disaster for him politically. He’s been mayor before, so I kept expecting him to distance himself from fray.
Uche Uwahemu has a few fresh ideas that could get the city moving, but is untested on the council and in government. Was he ready to be mayor – perhaps not just yet?
We are all much better off without Corky Booze on the city council. Poor grades on almost everything except tenacity – including tact. If you’ve ever met him in person, you will know exactly what I mean. Corky is an anachronism for what’s wrong with the city council. Unless you have good ideas and solutions, don’t try to be a leader. He was an obstructionist!
There’s a lot Richmond can work with Chevron and other industry giants on. Modernizing the refinery, rebuilding the under utilized port and making the 32 miles of shoreline, like Point Molate, a beautiful destination, could be a win for everyone. This is a city that works hard, just not smart.
Just because Chevron is Richmond’s biggest tax payer (btw, the real percentage of taxes they pay to the city is 13%, not 30%) doesn’t mean that they should own the city. Also, they don’t create jobs for Richmond. Out of 1200 employees, only seven percent are residents of Richmond. When Chevron ran the city (they had a Chevron executive at a desk in the City Managers Office, and they had a city council that owed Chevron their allegiance, the city was at it’s worst. Why should a corporation run a city? The city should be run by the people and their elected representatives, not by a corporation that hand picks the representatives that they want to do their bidding. Chevron is no friend of the City of Richmond. The new city council will hold Chevron responsible to make the refinery safer, and to lower emissions. They will make sure we get a decent and rightful settlement from Chevron for the fire of August 2012. And hopefully Chevron will agree to hire more Richmond residents.