Skip to content

Panorama of Chevron refinery.

Chevron spends big on candidates

on October 23, 2010

Chevron Corp. has spent $1 million this election season to support councilmembers Maria Viramontes, Ludmyrna Lopez and Nat Bates.

The oil giant gave the money to Jobs Now, a political action committee formed to support Lopez and Viramontes. According to campaign reports filed with the city clerk, the PAC has doled out $744,785 of the original million to promote the three candidates.

The amount put forth by Chevron dwarfs what each candidate has personally raised this year: Bates has received about $120,000 in direct contributions; Viramontes, approximately $66,000; and as of September 30, Lopez had amassed roughly $57,000.

Jobs Now PAC spent the majority of the money on slate mailers, campaign literature and phone banking. $18,000 in consulting fees also went to VR Research — the firm the police and fire unions hired to investigate mayor Gayle McLaughlin and candidate Jovanka Beckles.

The PAC used “independent expenditures” to buy advertising promoting the three councilmembers. The practice is commonplace in politics and wholly legal, so long as it is done without the candidate’s cooperation. The maneuver allows a group to spend big, but keep the information off of an individual candidate’s campaign filings.

Lopez said she appreciates the support and praised the company for trying to bring jobs to Richmond. Bates, who bills himself as pro-business and is a staunch supporter of Chevron, said he doesn’t pay attention to how much the groups supporting him spend.

When told that Chevron had spent $250,000 to his support his mayoral bid, Bates said, “That’s news to me.”

Both noted that Jobs Now PAC operates independently, and isn’t related to any of the campaigns.

Viramontes and a spokesman for Chevron could not reached for comment Friday afternoon.

According to Jobs Now’s most recent campaign filing, which was turned in Thursday, the PAC has split its money fairly evenly between the three candidates. As of October 16th, it had spent $230,283 expressly supporting Viramontes, and $229,082 to bolster Lopez.

The money for Bates, however, took a more circuitous route. Jobs Now PAC served as an intermediary for Chevron, contributing $250,000 to Get Richmond Working, a political action committee formed to support Nat Bates for mayor. As of October 16th, Get Richmond Working had spent $182,683 promoting Bates.

Chevron contributed the money to Jobs Now in September, in $450,000 and $550,000 chunks. With the election just over a week away, the PAC has approximately $255,000 of the original $1 million left to spend.


  1. Eduardo Martinez on October 24, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    In arguing which candidate is spending more than another, mixing the monies raised and spent by a candidate with the monies raised and spent by special interests for a candidate, as some people are want to do, creates opportunities for confusing the voter. The two should be kept separate as you have done in this article. I thank you for that. This is the best way to discern how much the special interests are investing and calls to question why they are investing so much.

  2. jessica on October 25, 2010 at 10:27 am

    Thank you for letting us know who is behind the mess in Richmond!

  3. […] has funded an independent expenditure committee, called Jobs Now, to support a handful of candidates, and has spent nearly a quarter of a million dollars on Lopez […]

  4. RvB on October 26, 2010 at 8:51 am

    They were pretty good about auditing that $25 Gayle spent on a chicken dinner, but when there’s suddenly $250,000 to spend on ad buys: where the heck did that come from? News to me!

  5. […] They’ve nicknamed her “both-ways Viramontes” for declaring opposition to Chevron, even though the company has spent $230,000 to support her campaign through a political action […]

  6. […] night. (Photo by Tyler Orsburn). The night’s results were a particular blow to Chevron, which spent $1 million supporting the campaigns of Viramontes, Lopez and mayoral candidate Nat Bates through political action […]

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top