Skip to content

Richmond’s Beckles tries to ride the progressive wave for a November upset against Buffy Wicks

on September 15, 2018

Before this summer, Jovanka Beckles wasn’t considered a serious candidate to represent California’s Assembly District 15. She was seen as far left and a long-shot.

But Beckles surprised pundits by placing second in the June primary. She was propelled forward after being endorsed by Our Revolution, a national group supporting progressive politicians that sprung out of Bernie Sanders’ failed but surprisingly virile presidential campaign. Her success shows the potency of progressive issues and how they’re making their mark on the Democratic party ahead of November’s mid-term elections.

Now the question is whether Beckles, who served on the Richmond City Council for eight years, can pull off an upset again. As she goes head-to-head with former President Barack Obama-backed Buffy Wicks, the upcoming November 6 race, like many others across the country, will serve as a litmus test for the direction of the Democratic party going forward.

“This election is a test of what is the strength of more progressive candidates, especially in these legislative races,” says Mark Baldassare, president and chief executive officer of the Public Policy Institute of California.

Over the past few months, progressive candidates have made impressive headway. Some Our Revolution-backed candidates have pulled off shocking upsets, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the 28-year-old Democratic socialist who defeated incumbent Joseph Crowley in the primary in a bid to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives from New York’s 14th district.

And the issues pushed by Sanders and Our Revolution are gaining traction, as seen in the similarities in Beckles’ and Wicks’ platform. Both call for California to have 100 percent renewable energy within the next few decades—Beckles by 2035, Wicks by 2045. Both want a single-payer healthcare system. And both call for expanded public education, although Beckles champions fully funded education from pre-K through college, while Wicks campaigns for subsidized pre-K and more government funding for higher education but isn’t specific on what proportion of education costs would be publicly funded.

Beckles and Wicks differ more in their spending and endorsements, however. Beckles has received endorsements from key labor unions, environmental organizations, and celebrities, such as Danny Glover. But Wicks, who worked on both Obama campaigns and in the President’s Office of Public Engagement, has received endorsements from California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, U.S. Senator Kamala Harris, and Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor who was also the chairman of the Democratic National Committee and a presidential contender.

Wicks has also raised almost twice as much as Beckles from January to June of 2018, according to the California Secretary of State’s office: $205,544 for Wicks versus $114,263 for Beckles. But the real difference is in their spending. Wicks outspent Beckles more than five to one during the same period, using her private funds to spend $514,839 on the campaign, versus $92,671 by Beckles’ campaign.

This spending power and political prowess may be part of why getting progressive items on the agenda is easier than getting progressive candidates into office. The New York Times reported in June that nationally fewer than 50 percent of the more than 80 candidates Our Revolution has endorsed have won elections this year. According to Dr. Thad Kousser, professor of political science at UC San Diego, Democrats are happy to move left on key issues, such as single-payer healthcare, but refrain from explicitly seeking Our Revolution’s endorsement because of Sanders’ socialist leaning.

“If you can get in on the positive of the policies without the negatives of Bernie Sanders, then there’s electoral advantage there,” Kousser says.

But Sanders isn’t flustered by electoral losses and the big-name politicians that Our Revolution candidates are up against. Other candidates backed by his group, including former Richmond Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, were handily beaten in the June primaries. Sanders has said that Our Revolution isn’t necessarily about winning but about building a progressive movement. Mark Van Landuyt, chairman of Our Revolution Contra Costa, says that the organization is reaching a wider group of voters.

“From Eureka to San Diego, progressive alliances have been forming,” he says, citing the California Progressive Alliance. “Even if you don’t achieve victory, we’re helping to define the future of California politics.”



  1. Janis Mara on September 16, 2018 at 6:21 pm

    “a surprisingly virile presidential campaign.” An interesting figure of speech.

  2. Sandra Davenport on September 16, 2018 at 11:23 pm

    There are so many outrageous things Beckles has said as City Council member. Too many to count! Remarks such as “Landlords are evil”; or Vinay Pimple is the pimple of Tom’s Butt. Honest to God she said these things. Go look it up. Jovanka is a left wing Donald Trump. The good news is whether she wins or loses, Richmond is done with her.

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top