Skip to content

Richmond residents voted no on Measure M at yesterday's election.

Residents vote ‘no’ on Measure M

on November 9, 2016

Yesterday, Richmond citizens firmly voted no on Measure M, a ballot measure to raise the documentary transfer tax on real estate sales.

With a total of 20,000 votes cast, more than 14,000 voted against the measure.

Measure M would have raised the tax from 0.7% per thousand dollars to one percent on properties sold for less than $400,000 and one and a half percent on properties sold for an amount equal to or greater than $400,000.

“I didn’t vote for Measure M because I don’t like transfer taxes,” said Richmond resident Christopher Nelson.

Resident Liz Masterson, a nurse, said she voted against Measure M because she didn’t have “enough information.”

Mayor Tom Butt, an outspoken advocate of Measure M, said he hoped the measure would pass because the potential revenue generated by a higher transfer tax—possibly $4 to $6 million annually—would have gone into the general fund to address Richmond’s budget deficit.

But some residents said they opposed the measure because they lacked faith in City Council’s ability to use the revenue to relieve that debt.

“The city’s finance is like a black hole, it’s like a bottomless hole,” said Richmond resident and business owner Jim Weng. “I feel the city’s finances are badly managed,” he said.

In April of this year, Russ Branson, a senior management consultant with the San Francisco firm Public Financial Management, gave a presentation to Richmond City Council on how to balance the five-year budget. Branson suggested raising the documentary transfer tax as a lucrative way to generate revenue for Richmond without cutting back on city services. City Council authored Measure M and included it in the structurally balanced 2016-17 budget.

Without the revenue from Measure M, said Butt, the City Council “will have to find other ways to address the city’s deficit, and continue to provide complete city services.”

When asked how he felt about the measure’s defeat, Butt said, “What can I say? We lost.”


  1. ritchie cook on November 10, 2016 at 8:03 am

    Measure M did not have the ground game that measure L did , but would have helped our city. The electorate just didn’t understand it. Perhaps a sales tax on real property? Wow!!! what a revenue !!

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top