Skip to content

Bay Bridge bike path on track—to be finished in 2025

on January 21, 2016

The good news: Plans to build a bike/pedestrian path on the west span of the Bay Bridge—connecting San Francisco, Treasure Island and Oakland—are moving full-speed ahead.

The project will connect the East Bay to the city and peninsula, by bike and foot. When the bridge is done, you’ll be able to bike from San Francisco to Oakland in 45 minutes.

It will allow party people to get home in the wee hours. Commuters will blaze back and forth across the bay. And the tourists are going to love it: The north side of the bridge offers panoramic sunset views of San Francisco’s skyline.

The bad news: Full-speed ahead, for a mega-project of this size, cost and complexity, is rather glacial. Don’t expect to cycle across the bay any sooner than 2025.

Eight years to completion is the best-case scenario—and ten or more is likely. That was one takeaway from a public meeting Wednesday night put on by the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) and Arup, the engineering consulting firm designing the addition.

Arup civil engineers including principal engineer Rich Coffin and lead bridge designer Rafael Manzanarez gave short presentations with an emphasis on the main choices that need to be made about the new bike/pedestrian path. Will it run along the north side, south side, or above the existing bridge? Where will it touch down in San Francisco? Where will it touch down on Yerba Buena Island?

“We have the opportunity to create something really inspiring,” which could last 100 or 200 years if properly maintained, said Manzanarez. But, as he pointed out to a standing-room only crowd, although it’s only two miles from Rincon Point in San Francisco to Yerba Buena Island, bridging those two miles presents serious engineering challenges. In fact, adding a bike path to half of the Bay Bridge isn’t just a huge project. It’s three huge projects.

The first involves the downtown San Francisco touchdown, where a huge ramp must be integrated into a dense urban environment. There are six possible sites, three on the north side and three on the south. The three possible sites on the bridge’s more scenic north side include turning Essex Street into a bike/pedestrian area connected to the new Transbay Terminal, turning the Caltrans Paint Yard into a public space, or touching down at the Embarcadero. But the climb there is about 150 feet, requiring multiple loops, according to Sean Young, one of the Arup civil engineers who spent much of 2015 working on the San Francisco touchdown plan.

“From a designer’s perspective, we’re trying to come up with a simple path that can be used by all,” Young said. “But in some areas we recognize that there’s the opportunity to have an iconic structure, something that’s visually appealing, that people will talk about, that people will want to use.”

The most dramatic designs for the San Francisco touchdown include giant spiral ramps with as many as five loops.

The second part of the project involves the main span. The multi-lane bike and pedestrian path itself could be attached to the side of the Bay Bridge, or it could be suspended above the roadway.

The bike bridge will likely be about 15 feet wide, enough for two lanes of biking plus one for pedestrians. Pedestrian paths on the Golden Gate Bridge vary from 6 to 10 feet wide, in contrast.

Attaching the main span to the Bay Bridge is the “biggest challenge,” Manzanarez said, because it’s not easy to attach new steel to old steel. Old steel gets brittle. It can’t be welded. The old bridge must be partially taken apart and the new parts must be integrated using bolts and plates to replace existing rivets.

“It’s just surgical work,” Manzanarez said with a laugh. “It’s getting into somebody’s body.”

There’s also the issue of sinkage. Adding new weight will cause the bridge to be six to eight inches lower, potentially endangering very tall ships and angering the Coast Guard. To solve this problem, Manzanarez said that the suspension wires could be tightened, raising the roadway back up six to eight inches.

Finally, there’s the connection to Yerba Buena Island. Another massive on/off ramp must be built there, and safe bike paths must be found to reach Treasure Island. At one point, a bike tunnel may be necessary. Additionally, the Bike Bridge will provide an important connection for the growing population of Treasure Island, planners said.

At the meeting, the schedule for the project was presented: By the end of this year, there should be a preliminary design and cost estimate. Environmental studies will take about two years. The final design could be unveiled in about 2020. Construction is expected to take four to five years, and present its own set of difficulties. Most importantly, funding must be secured—a lot of funding.

Building the bike bridge will cost hundreds of million of dollars. On Wednesday, Peter Lee of BATA said the goal is somewhere south of $300 million. Some of that money could come from increasing existing tolls, he suggested, while other funds could come from state and federal transportation money.

At this point in the process, the engineers at BATA and Arup are keen to get public feedback and narrow down alternatives by the end of the year. The meeting was the first chance many members of the public had to see renderings of the alternate designs for the three parts of the project. It was also a chance to give feedback on the project directly to the people who are planning it. Meeting participants wrote comments on sticky notes or directly on renderings. They chatted with representatives from BATA, Arup and ICF International, the firm handling the environmental studies related to the bike bridge construction.

“We were asked to look at innovative ideas,” said Rich Coffin of Arup. “This is a major investment in infrastructure… an opportunity for a new architectural icon along the waterfront.”

One strategy to avoid sticker shock, said John Ciccarelli of Bicycle Solutions, a consulting service, is to present a core design with optional add-ons. He likened it to a main course with optional side dishes. Politicians and planners could pick and choose features based on priorities and budget constraints, he said.

Once the bike connection across the bay is completed, Ciccarelli said, it could prove a boon to Oakland, acting as a new transport hub.

“If this becomes cool, development could respond,” Ciccarelli said. “Imagine Mandela Parkway starting to dot up with residences. Wouldn’t that be cool?”


  1. Tony Suggs on January 22, 2016 at 3:58 pm

    So, $300 million? Try twice that amount. Just look at the original cost of the eastern span and how it ballooned in costs.

    So, drivers will pay increased tolls. Will bikers have to pay anything at all?


    All this for a relatively few people to ride free across the Bay.

    • Jay Bee on February 5, 2016 at 11:51 am

      Tony, stay in your cage and keep huffing exhaust fumes.

      Bikers are taking cars off the road, decreasing congestion, decreasing environmental impact and creating a healthier, cleaner, safer environment.. there is value in that but your myopic and illogical false sense of entitlement blurs that reality.

      And your assessment of “relatively few people” is relative in and of itself. The estimate stated here is that thousands of less cars will cross the bridge each day, additionally this increases tourism on both sides of the bay.

      As I said earlier, stay in your cage kook, and out of the bike lane. Thanks,

  2. SKYPOD on January 24, 2016 at 11:06 am

    We have engineered, designed a patent pending system to cross the west span of the bridge. We have purposed our system to Caltrans, BATA, TIDA, Arup
    Arup will not consider our design because they are getting paid $10,000,000 for their work. Visit our website and see the future. We have private funding and this project can be finished in 18 months without distrusting the flow of traffic. It is time to make the State accountable for our time and money.

  3. Joseph on January 24, 2016 at 11:17 am

    Sidewalks down both side if the bridge. HAHA
    the lower deck would be a tunnel of darkness.
    The whole bridge would have to be redesigned.
    1 Billion Dollars. 15 years of hell on the bridge.
    I like the Gondola idea

  4. […] challenges. Rafael Manzanarez, another Arup engineer working on the project, outlined some of them, according this account from Richmond Confidential’s Sam Omar […]

  5. […] challenges. Rafael Manzanarez, another Arup engineer working on the project, outlined some of them, according this account from Richmond Confidential’s Sam Omar […]

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top