Three years away, but Richmond ferry plans steaming forward
on November 17, 2014
Transforming an island into a peninsula, a tunnel to Point Richmond—now the Dornan Drive Tunnel—was completed in 1915. It was the same year that welcomed the Richmond-San Rafael passenger ferry, a commuter steamer that chugged across the Bay for more than four decades before yielding to the 1956 bridge by the same name that connected the East Bay to Marin County.
Now, in concert with the Marina Bay Parkway-undercrossing project between Regatta Boulevard and Meeker Avenue, scheduled for completion in May 2015, a new ferry is coming to Richmond. Planners say the proposal, a direct service to San Francisco, is likely to turn to reality in 2018.
“In a perfect world we’d start tomorrow,” said Chadrick Smalley, a city development project manager.
He noted that it’s imperative to have the underpass complete first so commuters won’t have to deal with capricious train schedules: “People would miss their boat.”
Having already received state environmental approval, the ferry proposal is now in the “federal review” phase, according to Chad Mason, a transportation analyst and planner at the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA), which operates the key service routes in the Bay Area.
WETA’s newest expansion plan encompasses West Contra Costa County, including sites in Richmond, Hercules, Martinez, and Antioch. The federal agency would own and operate the Richmond terminal and ferry, assuming most of construction costs.
“A lot of things need to happen between now and 2018,” Mason said, referencing the federal funding agreements and approvals needed for the next steps, namely design, construction planning, and vessel procurement.
Since fares alone (between $6 and $8 each way) won’t cover operating and capital costs, the city will have to subsidize some of the ferry service.
In 1999 a San Francisco tour cruise company experimented for two years with a ferry in Richmond, but failed to attract sufficient passengers because of a slow boat, minimal scheduled trips and no operating subsidy.
Mayor-elect Tom Butt said for this project to work there first needs to be “a formal understanding between Richmond and Hercules about the appropriation” of about $22 million in Measure J funds, a Contra Costa County sales hike implemented in 2004 with the explicit purpose of transportation projects like this one.
According to a June staff report by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, which included some financial feasibility estimates, the project’s two vessels (one as a backup) will cost an estimated $34 million total in “initial capital expenditures,” with an estimated operating costs of about $3.46 million a year (subsidized by the city and fare revenue).
According to the report, terminal construction—at the existing passenger float and gangway, adjacent to the historic Ford Assembly building and Craneway Pavilion—will cost between $8 and $12 million, the least expensive of the proposals.
The total cost of the project is estimated between $42 and $46 million. Smalley said it’s “clearly the most feasible” of WETA’s current proposals in the county.
“We think it’s a great commute option that’s environmentally friendly and fast,” he said of the service’s planned six daily trips during peak hours in the morning and evening. “The city’s general plan calls specifically for this ferry.”
The report said the high-speed, high-capacity vessel will travel 10.9 nautical miles, taking 26 minutes. That commute will rival the one from the downtown BART, with a “much higher-quality rider experience” while being “superior to vehicular modes.
Smalley also said the “backhaul” commuters—San Francisco residents working at some of the high-tech firms in Marina Bay—offer additional appeal to the proposed terminal site.
The transportation authority listed several other benefits in its report:
- The port area is one of fastest growing in Richmond, with both residential and commercial projects planned, under construction or recently completed.
- There’s already deep water and an existing gangway. Smalley added that there would be minimal construction (very little underwater dredging) needed to complete the terminal.
- That set-up “coupled with strong policy support for transit translates to a great potential for demand for ferry service.”
Stanly Anderson, president of the Marina Bay Neighborhood Council, said the project “can be a great opportunity for developers” and has the “potential to be a catalyst for the area for new businesses and restaurants.”
“It’d also be nice if it dropped people off at Giants games,” he added.
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org.
I’m a bit puzzled about the need for a terminal that costs even as much as a million. Shelter for people waiting for a boat can be done cheaply to start, with canvas awnings. Does it include ticket sales? If so, why? The service could start with on board sales. Bathrooms? They weren’t there when there was a ferry for the two years after the 89 quake. Perhaps there would have been more riders had there been restrooms.
Without more detail I’m only guessing, but it seems to me that service could easily start before the terminal facilities are in place.
One of the reasons the earlier ferry failed was that no money was spent to advertise its existence to commuters backed up along the Richmond Parkway each morning, and for signage along the freeways to show people how to get there. Let’s do a better on this time. It was wonderful while it lasted and we loved it! It stopped at the ferry building, then went around to Fisherman’s Wharf, and was wonderfully convenient. I second the idea of ferry runs to Giants games, and possible Saturday schedules as well.
With UC expanding it’s campus in Marina Bay , it’s only a matter of time before , Richmond will see major gains , the recent discloser to the market shows the huge upside of the UC system making a major investment in Oakland , If the ferry was here today in Richmond would this transaction with UC have happened in Marina bay ? Once the plan comes together for Richmond the upside will change our city .( see below } Also Richmond must keep their eye on the connector road on the north shore to connect to the underpass.
UC Regents Plans to Buy 1111 Broadway in Oakland for Approximately $215MM
Posted on November 17, 2014 by publisher in Commercial, Finance, INDUSTRY news
By Jon Peterson
The Office of the University of California Regents is planning to pay approximately $380 per square foot or $215.1 million to acquire the 566,168 square foot 1111 Broadway office building in downtown Oakland, according to sources familiar with the property.
Currently, BART is dangerously overcrowded during commute hours. If anyone with the power to do anything to expedite this would simply ride the Richmond/SF-bound BART during these hours, they would see that it is an emergency. I hope Richmond/Pt Richmond sees this Ferry happen, eventually, because a commute on the water vs. being crammed into an underground tube is a no-brainer even without the current BART issues. Maybe a stop-gap alternative should be put in place sooner than 2018 — something that made use of what’s already installed there, which seems perfectly serviceable to me?
That was an auto ferry to Pt.San Quentin starting up in 1915 – not just a passenger ferry as stated.