Richmond City Council puts Chevron-DMC motion on hold while patients and hospital hold on
on October 8, 2014
The fate of Doctors Medical Center remained in doubt after five hours of heated arguments at the Richmond City Council meeting Tuesday, which adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
The council postponed until Oct. 21 any resolution regarding whether to provide funds to help save the failing hospital, but several members expressed a willingness to reverse their previous positions and allocate some funds to the hospital.
The session featured displays of temper and insults hurled among council members as 41 public witnesses waited to testify for or against various funding proposals to keep the hospital open.
As the discussion of DMC moved its way up the agenda, Councilmember Tom Butt traded barbs with Councilmember Courtland “Corky” Boozé. Butt later walked out and Mayor Gayle McLaughlin pounded the gavel, saying she was calling for a recess. She then walked out.
Boozé used the break to speak directly to the community.
Boozé, who is requesting that DMC receive $20 million of Chevron’s $90 million contractual agreement with Richmond, came out from behind the lectern and approached the crowd waving documents relating to the plan.
Members of National Nurses United at the meeting said they support the funding plan but confronted Boozé, calling him out for alleged past inconsistencies on DMC funding.
The nurses flooded the room with red and gold posters saying “Save DMC, Save Lives,” while accusing Boozé of playing reelection politics with his votes.
After the meeting reconvened, the council and the community heard from DMC’s Chief Executive Officer Dawn Gideon, who stressed that Chevron relied on the hospital’s services during the refinery fire of 2012.
DMC physician Dr. Desmond Carson addressed the council wearing a cast, saying he used DMC services to treat his broken leg.
Among the witnesses who waited was Josefina Romero, who arrived about an hour early. Like many, she wanted to speak face-to-face with the council about the need for DMC to stay open.
In 2008, Romero began her long-term relationship with DMC when doctors treated her for breast cancer. In 2012, doctors told her that her cancer was advancing.
Romero, who is now undergoing chemotherapy and has a chemo port protruding from her shoulder, wanted to thank DMC physicians for “saving my life.” She had to wait as councilmembers’ arguments dragged on.
By 10 p.m., Romero could no longer wait around for the other 41 registered public speakers and councilmembers who continued arguing. Saying she was feeling ill, she packed up her belongings and walked out with her husband, who had to be up early for work the next morning so that she could continue to be on his health insurance.
With pleas from the community to exhibit leadership and start the process of saving DMC, officials offered two similar motions postponing the decision.
Councilmember Boozé and Mayor McLaughlin both proposed that Richmond City Manager Bill Lindsay take more time to meet with Chevron leaders and a coalition of local officials, then report back to the council in two weeks.
Just before adjourning at 11:30 p.m., a majority of councilmembers passed the mayor’s motion that the council:
– “express its intent” to cut 15% from many non-DMC programs funded with Chevron money.
– direct staff to come back on Oct. 21 with a multi-year allocation plan after the end of litigation between Chevron and Communities for a Better Environment, a lobbying group.
– direct staff to come back after Oct. 21 with a plan for additional funding for DMC.
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org.
1. It is impossible for the property owners in the districts served to afford this hospital. Two previous increases in property taxes have failed to stop closure.
2. This hospital’s Administration has been grossly overpaid. Any failing institution that pays its directors over $300,000 per year is corrupt.
3. The primary use of this hospital is by people who cannot afford medical care, and whose health therefore requires expense emergency care services. Patients with good health insurance go to other hospitals.
4. The high real estate value of the property means that private interests (like the casino), will pay a premium for it, above what public funding will pay. The hospital directors and financial ‘owners’ know this.
5. Area hospitals and private health care systems (like Kaiser & Blue Cross), have been using DMC as a toilet to direct their public responsibilities for emergency care, as it is too expensive for their for-profit systems, and the patients can not pay.
6. There is no way that DMC can survive without major public funding, and that will not happen given the existing corrupt administration, and its history of mis-management.
7. Any City of Richmond funding of the hospital is useless, and will only stop closure for a few months. There is NO WAY the City can afford this mess, no matter how high the quality of the nurses and doctors who serve there, whom have been professionally amazing.