Skip to content

Panel discusses complex Chevron-Richmond relationship

on September 12, 2013

Chevron plays a major role in the politics and the economy of the city of Richmond. But that relationship is anything but harmonious, as an audience at the UC Berkeley School of Law heard on Wednesday.

Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia and oil and energy policy analyst Antonia Juhasz described the long history of conflict and cooperation between the third-largest revenue-earning corporation in the country and the Richmond community.

“There’s always been a love-hate relationship between the city and Chevron,” said Gioia.

There are people in Richmond who are unwaveringly skeptical of Chevron for its environmental impact, he said. And on the other end of the spectrum, there are people who think the jobs and tax benefits of the refinery outweigh any costs. But most people are somewhere in the middle, he said.

“The vast majority are skeptical of Chevron, but believe it provides benefits that exceed the costs,” he said.

But the group sympathetic to having an oil refinery in town has been shrinking in recent years, Gioia added.

“Public support is at an all-time low.”

Last month, Chevron pleaded no contest in a criminal lawsuit brought by the county and the attorney general to six counts, including failure to perform needed repairs on equipment and for negligent emissions.

The $2 million fine was hardly a penalty for the company which made $26 billion in profits last year, Juhasz said, who has written extensively on the impact and operations of major oil companies.

“In California, Chevron is the most powerful player,” she said. “The cost-benefit analysis of the company ends up being to break the law.”

Several factors have contributed to the decline in the public support for Chevron. First, there have been an increasing number accidents at the refinery, the most severe incident being last year’s fire on August 6. Another factor is that fewer Richmond residents are working at the refinery. According to Gioia, the last time a refinery manager lived in Richmond was in the 1970’s.

A rising community awareness of the environmental impact of greenhouse gases has also prompted more criticism of the refinery. Over the past few years, Chevron has increased its influence over local politics, Gioia said. The company is now the largest funder of political candidates’ campaigns in Richmond, he said.

“I think that’s also created a lot of skepticism of the company,” he said.

Chevron was asked to provide a representative on the panel, but the company declined, said Boalt Lecturer Jamie O’Connell, the event’s moderator. The Richmond Chamber of Commerce and the Western States Petroleum Association also declined to participate, he said.

According to Chevron’s website, the company is committed to increasing local hiring at the refinery by 50 percent over the next five years.

The lawsuit brought by residents in response to last year’s fire may not pay handsomely to the individuals, but it is creating pubic awareness, Juhasz said. Many local groups, including Communities for a Better Environment, are also creating dialogues and partnerships in the city to work towards holding Chevron accountable, she said.

Communities for a Better Environment is hosting a “Community Update: Chevron Fire One Year Later” event tonight to discuss the response to the fire, what else should be done to hold Chevron accountable and how to make Richmond a healthy community. The event will be held from 6:30-8 p.m at the Bobby Bowens Progressive Center at 1021 MacDonald Avenue.


  1. Jeanne Kortz on September 12, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    Chevron might be Richmond’s largest employer, but in reality Richmond residents make up only six to ten percent of their 1200 employees at the refinery. They have not paid their property taxes for the last two years, and owe the county around $50 million dollars, while at the same time giving $1 million (that would be in total) to homeless and youth organizations, and even the West County school district. I would think the schools would be better off, as would the rest of the county, if Chevron paid their property taxes as opposed to trying to make themselves look like the good guys.In 2012, Chevron had a net profit of $26.2 billion dollars, yet they were too cheap and concerned about their profits to fix their pipes (they were advised in-house back in 2002) which led to the disastrous fire and explosion that sent 15,000 people to the hospital, causing emotional damage as well. This kind of operation makes it difficult to attract new business to the city, and hurts Richmond’s property values. Chevron needs to be a better neighbor, not just with words and promises, but with real acts.

  2. Juan Reardon on September 12, 2013 at 6:40 pm

    Love-hate relationship with Chevron in Richmond…yes = The People hate Chevron-John Gioia Loves Chevron

    How much did Chevron contributed to your campaigns Gioia?

    We struggle against Chevron, and you get to speak about it? You have never done anything for Richmond’s environment.

    Go away Gioia

  3. JL on September 12, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    The refinery was built in 1902. You people are the ones who decided to live next to it. Who is at fault here?

    • EH on September 13, 2013 at 9:00 pm

      According to the Contra Costa County Tax Assessors website Chevron paid $71.6M in tax to the county for fiscal year 2011-2012.


      Chevron is by far the largest single taxpayer in Contra Costa County (followed by PG&E at $25M). The $50M mention by another commenter represents the cumulative amount Chevron is disputing through legal action regarding the assessed value of the refinery.

      Info on tax Chevron paid to the City of Richmond is more difficult to come by. Some published information states that the portion of city tax revenue in the form of utility user taxes and property taxes is up to 33% of all city tax revenue. Other sources show about 10%. (Total general city revenue in 2011-2012 fiscal year was $128.6M.The total utility user tax revenue was $51M and total property tax collected was $28.3M.)

      Pacific Institute Study of Chevron Tax Revenues for Richmond (2008).

      City of Richmond Annual Financial Report.
      Revenue info on pg.38

  4. Parajumpers Alisee K on September 22, 2013 at 1:34 am

    It could be. But mellifluous certain, it could set someone back you so much buying a pre-owned website.

  5. JS on October 8, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    “‘The vast majority are skeptical of Chevron, but believe it provides benefits that exceed the costs,’ he (Gioia) said.”

    Lol. “They’re an awful roommate. They smell bad and don’t clean up after themselves. But, I mean, if they leave, they’re taking the rug and the dining room set. I mean, that rug really ties the room together!”

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top