Open Carry Ban in Richmond
on October 18, 2012
Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill late last month making it illegal to visibly carry loaded or unloaded shotguns or rifles.
In San Francisco the open carry ban has spurred debates and some protests by open carry advocates. But across the Bay in Richmond, the response has been more muted, and some citizens said the ban won’t have a substantial impact on their city.
Kevin Muccular, a change agent with the Office of Neighborhood Safety, said that his organization hadn’t really encountered any problems involving open carry or its ban.
As one of its goals ONS seeks to reduce gun violence within the Richmond community, and he said the ban won’t really affect the individuals they work with.
“They’re not going to register their assault rifles or AK-47s,” Muccular said.
The law was an extension of a ban passed last year that restricted the open carry of handguns. The consequence of breaking the law would be a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment, fines, or both. There were exceptions to the law that included: military personnel included in a parade, licensed hunters traveling to and from a hunting expedition, and members of gun clubs at target ranges. It was introduced earlier this year, by Assemblyman Anthony Portantino, and takes effect January 1.
RPD Detective Nicole Abetkov said she agreed with Brown’s decision to sign the law.
“We’ve never had any negative experiences with open carry here,” she said. But she said she agreed with any tactic to increase the safety of RPD officers and the Richmond community in regards to gun violence.
Abetkov also said that the only time she’s had substantial contact with open carry was last year when a group approached the RPD to plan an open-carry demonstration in Richmond, but never did.
Gary Buffon, a member of the Richmond Rod and Gun Club, said that there is almost always a faulty premise used to create more gun-restriction laws: that the new laws will decrease crime rates.
“It is simple to see that crime reduction never occurs,” Buffon said in an email, “just more meaningless ways to make it more difficult for gun owners.”
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to email@example.com.
Guys, seriously?? Not that I agree with it but Open Carry is practiced by law abiding citizens and the weapons are unloaded and in plain sight. Your typical Richmond shooter, on the other hand, is going to be a felon with a stolen handgun hidden in his clothing. That’s breaking probably half a dozen laws and the Open Carry ban is meaningless in these cases.
Although the ban eliminates the last vestige of “bearing” from “the right to keep and bear arms”, I never thought Open Carry made much sense because it does cause more work for local PD and it can make you the unwitting target of criminals who decide they want your firearm.