Booze-Ritterman feud flares over CyberTran vote
on September 22, 2011
As Councilmember Corky Booze delivered his closing remarks at Tuesday night’s meeting, Councilmember Jovanka Beckles breathed heavily, repeatedly, into the PA system. Six minutes into his speech, Booze paused.
“I can hear you Councilwoman Beckles going, ‘Waaaaah!’ Waaaah!” he said.
“I’m breathing!” she replied.
The running feud between Booze and other councilmembers continued Tuesday night in both minor disputes and in a tense back-and-forth on one particularly sore subject: the Richmond-based light-rail company CyberTran.
Last week, Councilmember Jeff Ritterman filed a complaint with the Fair Political Practices Commission alleging that Booze met CyberTran officials to ask for campaign funds. According to Ritterman’s complaint, when Cybertran turned down the councilmember’s request, Booze threatened to make trouble for the company.
When CyberTran came up on the agenda Tuesday, Booze used the occasion to defend himself.
“Some people have said I was attacking CyberTran and trying to run them out of town,” he said. “I don’t know CyberTran from Adam. It bothers me that people would say that.”
After repeatedly questioning Cybertran’s ability to bring jobs to Richmond, Booze circled back to the FPPC complaint.
“I’ve never met with you before have I, Mr. Sinclair,” he asked Neil Sinclair, the CyberTran CEO.
Sinclair answered, “You haven’t met with me, you have met one of my vice presidents.”
Booze read from Ritterman’s FPPC complaint and then asked, “Have you ever seen me ask for a campaign contribution?”
“I’ve never had a private meeting with you,” Sinclair said.
McLaughlin began to object to Booze’s line of questioning, but Booze insisted. “Just answer me,” he said. “Look at me and answer me.”
“Are you asking if any of our people have ever met with you?” Sinclair said. “I think one of our people has met with you.”
When Booze asked which person it was, Sinclair said he didn’t want to get into personnel issues – and McLauglin stepped in again.
“This is not about personalities,” Booze said to Sinclair. “This is about working together. This is about who you are working with. I’ve never met with you in my life.”
After pausing to regain his composure, Booze said, “I have no axe to grind with you. I have no axe to grind with Councilman Ritterman … I do have an axe to grind when the people of Richmond are spending money on a lobbyist, on a dream.”
Throughout the discussion, Ritterman praised CyberTran but avoided a direct confrontation with Booze. Beckles, though, was more candid, saying she was embarrassed by what she called Booze’s hypocrisy.
“I find it interesting that the same individuals who stand on soap boxes and shout, ‘We need jobs’ every opportunity they get, are the same individuals who are criticizing this opportunity for jobs,” Beckles said. “This is an economic opportunity that is priceless for the people of Richmond.”
Beckles concluded her own message by telling the community to “please pay attention,” to councilmembers who didn’t vote in favor of CyberTran and its potential jobs.
The final vote was 4-1, with Booze the only opposition.
After a brief halt in the theatrics for the next few motions, Booze announced he would also send his own direct “message to the community.”
Booze recalled his opposition to the CyberTran motion, his dissatisfaction with the council, and what he said was his commitment to his people.
“I work for all of Richmond,” he said. “All of it. Right now, I am working for the African American Community, trying to stop the shooting.”
As he continued, Beckles again started to sigh more audibly. “This is not the time to campaign,” she said
Joe Fisher, president of the Coronado Neighborhood Committee and businessman, said campaign strategy probably does play a part of the council’s recent confrontations.
“I look at all this as politics,” Fisher said. “They are running for 2012, so we are going to hear a whole lot.”
Fisher said he’s standing by Booze.
“Booze has always been consistent,” he said. “I think Ritterman is spinning his wheel and I think he knows it.”
Michael Beer, a community activist allied with the Richmond Progressive Alliance, said he thinks Booze is the one posturing to secure votes.
“Richmond has a tradition of people trying to divide the community in terms of my people, your people,” he said. “Booze always does it. He always does it.”
Beer added that not too long ago, he supported Booze.
“I helped Corky get elected because we thought he was a man of the people,” he said. “Now it seems like he’s a man for Corky. He takes it all on himself. He is the savior and that’s the role he played.”
At Tuesday’s meeting, one thing was clear: Booze was going to take on Ritterman, McLaughlin and Beckles, even if it meant marginalizing himself in the council.
Before McLaughlin had finished her final remarks – a tribute to the late activist Fred Jackson, whose funeral last Friday brought together hundreds from the community – Booze had left his seat and begun to converse in the chamber.
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org.
CyberTran is apparently unwilling to give campaign contributions to Corky…so why would anyone expect Corky to vote for 20,000 possible jobs for Richmond?
Corky is all about Corky and Corky did not get his cut… No cut, no Corky vote.
Old Richmond at its worst.
“20,000 POSSIBLE jobs”? Um, no. Not unless those jobs all involve shoving the Pods back on their tracks, or lobbyists suppressing news of PRT failures: http://prtboondoggle.blogspot.com/2011/09/tragic-waste-of-taxpayers-dollars-on.html
PRT is a boondoggle pushed as a way for frightened white exurbies to have quasi-light rail without risking sitting next to people whose skins are darker than theirs. It is often confused with true light rail as a way to leach money from the real thing.
Corky Booze needs to lay off the Booze .
One has to wonder how realistic this project is, and more significantly for Richmond, how smart it is to put thousands of dollars (that we can’t afford to waste) toward a lobbying effort to get federal funding in the wake of the Solyndra scandal and fallout. I’d like to be a believer, and it’s hard to say no to the promise of 20,000 jobs, but if you dig deeper, it doesn’t look rosy or realistic, and will most likely be a waste of money that could be far better spent on more pressing issues in Richmond. Here’s some interesting reading:
Thanks Andrew, I hadn’t heard of the Alameda proposal.
Ah, the pleasure of being asked your opinion. Ay, the pain of being misquoted.
I spoke with Alexis Kenyon for almost an hour. My main point she has rendered accurately. For years, Corky has been an outsider sniping at City Council members who needed chastisement. Now, Corky is an insider, and it seems to me has yet to realize that to do good in Richmond requires a change of style and a spirit of cooperation. I offered the same analysis to Corky in a private email.
I donated and worked for his election. I convinced myself and others, when they dismissed his antics, that he had finally matured. Hoo-boy!
However, the rest of the article seems a mis-understanding of what I said. I spoke in general about how the City of Richmond was African-American, Latino-American and European-American; 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3. (You guess which is which) with Asian-Americans a smaller percentage. (I know it doesn’t add.) What I said was there are no saviors, and nobody speaks for one-third of Richmond.
I have one other quibble. I feel honored to be matched with Joe Fisher. He is a well-known civic figure, and I am just an ordinary Joe. But I do object to the one-sided reporting of “allied with the RPA”. Reporting like this could turn into an object lesson of the Richmond tradition of divisiveness that I decried at length to Alexis.
If one wanted reporting balance, Mr. Fisher should have been described as “allied with the Chevron Corporation,” a title he would be the first to proudly acknowledge. All of this is clearly laid out in the East Bay Express article, “A friend of Chevron gives it a costly gift.” As we know, Chevron enjoys silently pulling the strings of Richmond politics.
The irony about Chevron’s hiring of African-American street persons to break-up a “Yes on Measure T” press conference (I have photos of white Chevron employees overseeing the “protest”) is that it was Corky Booze who told us, “I recognize them. They are Joe Fisher’s people.”
A better Richmond is possible.
Thanks for your input. We continually value your opinions and believe your thoughts help serve to inform Richmond Confidential and the Richmond community.