Skip to content

Lucky number four for Nat Bates?

on October 19, 2010

Editor’s note: Richmond Confidential’s official coverage of the 2010 election begins today. In the coming weeks, we’ll profile every candidate for office.

Nat Bates knows everybody’s name.

And that’s just for starters. Union affiliations, wives’ occupations, grandmothers’ life stories — no detail is too small.

“Once you been in politics as long as I have,” Bates says, taking a quick break from working the room at a fundraising dinner last month, “you have a lot friends.”

Dressed in a dark suit with a smart tie and pocket square, he’s the center of attention.

A few minutes later, Contra Costa County’s sheriff takes the stage to praise Richmond City Council’s longest serving member.

“I support good government, I support good people, and I support Nat Bates,” Sheriff Warren Rupf says.

Bates grins and the 300 some odd attendees dig into their $75 dinners.

At 79, Bates fancies himself dean of the City Council. He’s been in office for 30 years — longer than any other councilmember in the city’s history — and has served as mayor twice, back when it was a position appointed by the council. This is his fourth time running for the job, after three unsuccessful attempts.

A few weeks and one political bombshell after that late-September fundraiser, Bates sits in his office across from Nicholl Park on MacDonald Ave. He’s wearing blue jeans and a T-shirt and laces the conversation with friendly expletives. He’s got a Bluetooth in his right ear, and opts to ignore several calls over the course of an hour-long interview.

Nine days earlier, Bates alerted the media to Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s 2001 bankruptcy and history of depression. Since then, opponents have denounced his tactics and tried to make his “dirty politics” a rallying cry.

Bates, 79, has been in office on and off since 1967. He's run for mayor unsuccessfully three times before.

But Bates, a former probation officer, isn’t apologetic and he’s not backing down.

“It was not me who tried to get out of paying the student loans back. I didn’t do that,” Bates says. “Everybody has to be accountable for their own behavior.”

Character is a valid thing for voters to judge, he says.

“When you’re in politics, your life is an open book: whatever you say, whatever you do, whatever people find out about you — negative or positive,” Bates says, shrugging off the accusations. “That’s politics.”

And politics is something Bates knows about. In his three decades on the council, he’s earned a reputation as a master operator.

“I’ll tell you this,” Councilmember Maria Viramontes said recently. “Nat’s one of the shrewder political people I’ve ever met. I have to wake up awful early to get ahead of Nat.”

But Bates is not beyond self-doubt. He doesn’t second-guess his actions, just his timing. Should he have waited closer to Election Day? Should he have sat on the information and let the police and fire unions — who hired a research firm to dig up dirt on McLaughlin in the first place — tip off the press?

“I probably should not have done it,” Bates said about releasing the documents before the unions. “It was coming out anyway. It was going happen.”

How will it impact the election? The master operator is without an answer.

“I have no idea,” Bates said.

This sort of calculation can’t be new to Bates. He’s been a political brawler for years, and he’s no stranger to the seamier side of politics.

Bates addresses the crowd during a speech at a community block party in North Richmond this September. (Photo by Robert Rogers)

In 2005, he was fined by the Fair Political Practices Commission for failing to properly disclose campaign contributions. And in 1999, he was questioned by the FBI about his relations with the firefighters union powerbroker Darrell Reese. In the end, Bates was not found guilty of any wrongdoing in the Reese case.

But no one is alleging that Bates is bending the rules this year. On the stump, he stresses his deep local roots, and misses few opportunities to note that McLaughlin is relatively new to town.

And in a city with more than 18 percent unemployment, Bates talks up the importance of jobs, jobs, jobs: He says that the mayor values the environment over businesses and that her opposition to a proposed casino development at Pt. Molate will cost Richmond jobs.

No one questions Bates’ pro-business bona fides.

He accepts large contributions from companies in and outside the area. He’d like to let developers build in parts of the city the mayor has tried to protect. Businesses — especially Chevron Corp. — are key to the city’s future, he says, and he vows to provide an accommodating atmosphere in which they’ll flourish.

Backing Chevron is anathema to the mayor’s progressive supporters and they are quick to label Bates the Chevron candidate. But he’s used to the abuse. He might even relish it.

“I been on both ends of the stick. I been accused, I been vilified, I been applauded,” Bates said. “People don’t understand politics. As Harry Truman said, ‘You can’t stand the heat, you better get out of the kitchen.’”

Launch Interactive

Examine the money behind Richmond’s mayoral contest with Richmond Confidential’s new interactive campaign finance tool.|Campaign Finance Explorer


  1. Tim W on October 19, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    The author should speak to Councilman Tom Butt about this article. The tenor of this piece is extremely soft on Bates — I almost get the sense that everyone thinks him a hero. There is definitely an alternative view that would have provided some balance to this article. Personally, I find Bates amusing, but somewhat arrogant.

    It might also have been nice to have gotten some perspective on his campaign pieces — such as the claim that he brought Honda to Richmond and Mayor McLaughlin voted against that proposal.

    Finally, though I know that Richmond Confidential is a Cal Journalism project (greatly appreciated!), you guys need to do some basic line editing and fact checking. Is Bates 79 or 78, for example? The article states both. What else isn’t correct in this piece?

    • David Ferry on October 19, 2010 at 1:36 pm

      Apologies, the photo cutline was incorrect. Bates is 79.

      Thanks for pointing this out.

      David Ferry

  2. Pride And Purpose on October 19, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    “When you’re in politics, your life is an open book…”


Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top