Skip to content

Candidates outline ideas at school board forum

on October 1, 2010

The six candidates running for the West Contra Costa Unified School District Board of Education appeared before voters Wednesday night at a forum that was as much an economics lesson as a political gathering.

Financial issues, from budget woes to charter school funding, dominated the discussion, held on an uncomfortably warm evening in the cafeteria at Pinole Valley High School. The three incumbents seeking re-election to the five-member board said they stand behind their record of balancing the budget without cutting essential school services. The three challengers said more needs to be done.

“The big issue in California today —and there is one big overriding issue— is money,” said current board president Madeline Kronenberg, who is up for re-election. “The children in Newark get $26,000 apiece from the state of New Jersey. The children of California get less than $5,000, and we’re expected to do the same job and to compete on the same playing field.”

School board member Charles Ramsey also touted the current board’s accomplishments. He said the district has come a long way since 1990, when the district ran out of money under a former superintendent.

“This is not like the days of Walter Marks when budgets were running amok and we went bankrupt,” Ramsey said. “Just today I saw San Jose Unified. Guess what? They’re off for the entire week because they cut their instructional days from 180 to 175. We kept our instructional time because we’ve been fiscally responsible.”

Charles Cowens, a challenger who chaired the school district’s Community Budget Advisory Committee for five years, said the board needs to be more transparent about the budgeting process. He also said balancing the budget is the board’s duty, and not necessarily something to be lauded.

“The decisions the board makes are very difficult and you always have to give some respect to the people on the board for having to make those decisions, whether you agree with them or not,” he said. “But one thing to keep in mind is that balancing the budget is not a big accomplishment.”

Candidate Jason Freeman, a teacher, acknowledged that the current board has done a good job of making the budget available to the public through board committees and the Internet. But he said the language and amount of material in the budget still makes it inaccessible for most people.

“The budget is very large and complex,” he said. “If you’re a parent who has multiple children and multiple jobs, you cannot commit the time necessary to learn every detail of that budget, and you shouldn’t be asked to.”

Charter schools also sparked discussion. The district is home to five tuition-free public charter schools: Leadership Public High, West County Community High, Manzanita Charter School, Making Waves Academy, and the Richmond College Prep Schools, made up of a preschool and K-5 program.

Candidate Elaine Merriweather, a longtime teacher, said charter schools divert crucial resources from traditional public schools, which she said deserve more attention and financial support.

“Why can’t all of our schools be great schools that everyone would want to go to?” Merriweather asked. “It’s going to take some work. It’s going to take someone who’s going to stand up, speak up, and do the hard work of making our schools great schools.”

School board member Audrey Miles said it’s not that easy.

“There is a lack of funding in public schools and we continue to have a deficit because we’re constantly fighting a battle with the budget,” she said. “It really, truly upsets me that we’re comparing apples and oranges.”

Despite the disagreements and the heat, panel members remained cordial. Audience members who braved the stuffy conditions said they appreciated the opportunity to hear from the candidates.

“Over all, I’m glad I came,” said Katherine Acosta, a special education teacher at Lincoln Elementary. “Now I feel like I have a better sense of what everybody, including the incumbents and the new candidates, stand for and who I want to support.”

Christina Slamon, who regularly attends school board meetings, said she’ll vote for the incumbents based on their record —and a desire not to repeat history.

“They’ve made some very tough decisions but it has kept us from going back into bankruptcy,” she said. “We’ve already been through that once and we don’t want to go through it again.”


  1. Concerned on October 2, 2010 at 9:47 am

    Money is certainly a concern and ought to be, but it strikes me as problematic that there is no mention in this article of student learning. Did the candidates even mention it? Isn’t student learning what the school district is there for? And yes, I agree that we need more money to increase student learning, but until that money comes, we ought to be talking about what we can do with what we have. For example, why didn’t board members say that the average of 21% proficient or advanced on the CSTs in English language arts at Kennedy High School is unacceptably low. Why didn’t someone say that the average of 20% proficient or advanced on the CSTs in English language arts at Richmond High School is a terrifying fact about the types of readers that our community is producing. In short, quips about the budget miss the mark. There are tens of thousands of kids in this district, and serving them now – not when the money starts rolling in – is something to which we should devote more time.

  2. John Tysell on October 3, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Making Waves Academy is also a charter school located in Richmond

  3. Ed Ukashen on October 6, 2010 at 8:18 am

    The board NEVER discusses student learning except when Ramsey and Kranninborg want to tap themselves on the back for the college connectionb. the district hates making waves because they educate students better than the district does.
    All the district cares about is money, buildings and their salary.

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top