Skip to content

Broker claims city owes $1.5 million for Point Molate

on January 18, 2010

Commercial real estate broker John Troughton claims the City of Richmond agreed to pay him $1.5 million if the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians came to Point Molate. But Troughton admits no deal was signed, and no one at City Hall has acknowledged the agreement.

What Troughton, a Cushman & Wakefield senior director, does have is a letter that shows he met with four council members and city officials about Point Molate in November 2002. Council members Nat Bates and Jim Rogers attended the meeting along with former council members Richard Griffin and Mindell Penn, according to the city’s letter, which Troughton showed Richmond Confidential.

When reached by phone, Rogers wouldn’t comment on the meeting and alleged agreement. He said he’s been advised by the city attorney not to discuss it.

“It’s a matter that is potentially involving litigation,” he said.

Troughton claims that during this meeting, which four of the then-nine council members attended, the city agreed to pay a $1.5 million finder’s fee if he could convince the Guidiville Band to open a casino at Point Molate.

Administrative Chief Janet Schneider said she didn’t know anything about the deal, but she also said she didn’t start working for the city until several years after the meeting.

“I’m not aware of any involvement with Cushman & Wakefield,” she said. “There’s certainly no documents to that effect that I’m aware of.”

Troughton has worked on many Indian casino projects in the Bay area, and he said that he was already engaged with the Guidiville Band in their search for land to develop.

After taking the city’s offer, Troughton said he attended tribal meetings to promote Point Molate. He said he was also the first person to take the tribe to see the land.

“My only mistake was trusting [the City of Richmond],” said Troughton. “In my mind they owe my company the money.”

But council member Tom Butt said that Troughton has no claim to the money without a written contract.

“It’s a figment of his imagination,” said Butt. “If there’s no contract, there’s no fee. … If they think the city owes them money for this, I think they’re dreaming.”


  1. Ted2000 on January 19, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    Troughton sounds like a crook trying to cash in on a non-legal agreement. Shouldn’t the council have needed to approve such an agreement for it to be binding? I suspect the City will have to defend a lawsuit and I hope they counter sue Troughton for wasting everyone’s time.

  2. Corey on January 28, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    The bigger question is “why is Richmond allowing a casino to be built?”

    Casinos prey on the under-resourced and under-educated, getting them addicted to hope which is a powerful narcotic. It’s nothing more than a very expensive form of entertainment. Walnut Creek would never allow something like this …because they’re smarter than us.

  3. Francesa on March 6, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    We should unite as a community and oppose the construction of a casino in Richmond.
    Who would come to a casino in Richmond? Who?

  4. […] Broker claims city owes $1.5 million for Point Molate Filed Under: Arts & Entertainment, Changing City, Economy, Front, Point Molate, Uncategorized Tagged: bay area , casino , point molate , pomo indians , richmond , upstream This entry was written by Robert Rogers, posted on at 10:15 pm, filed under Arts & Entertainment, Changing City, Economy, Front, Point Molate, Uncategorized and tagged bay area, casino, point molate, pomo indians, richmond, upstream. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « City leaders urge against Chevron tax measure […]

  5. swede on August 26, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    he should go away or better yet walk out on the san rafel bridge and jump off and go for a swimm these type of crooks are the same type that caused the real estate crash with over apraised commercial and residential properties and crazy loan fees 10,000 to process loans at adjustable rates to rip people off,for every dollar this guy makes somebody is getting burned with crazy fees,charges,you might as well call it extortion he looks like a crook,sounds like a crook gets paid for doing nothing,heck he should run for city council,administrator,and vote for his own raise and inflated pension.MUGU

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top