City, developer in disagreement over alleged violations at Historic Ford Plant
on December 21, 2009
A letter from Richmond City Attorney Randy Riddle says that Orton Development isn’t living up to its part of the contract at the Historic Ford Assembly Plant.
Orton Development president Eddie Orton says he wants some patience. He says he’s been working with the city and doesn’t understand why the city attorney would send him a letter he says is “inaccurate and wrong.” Calls to the city attorney’s office seeking comment were not returned.
Orton was contracted by the Richmond Redevelopment Agency to rehabilitate the 561,000-foot Ford Plant, which first opened in 1931 and processed military vehicles during World War II. Orton was issued a conditional use permit in 2003.
Much of the project has been completed – businesses have moved in and are operating, the BoilerHouse Restaurant is open and the Craneway Pavilion houses events.
But according to a letter dated Dec. 7 from the city attorney, Orton Development is still in violation of its agreement with the city, the conditional use permit and “related permits and leases” more than nine months after the city sent a previous letter demanding the violations be remedied.
The Dec. 7 letter highlights two areas where it deems inadequate progress has been made: That Orton provide a rent-free space to the National Park Service for a visitor’s center; and that Orton provide public access for the San Francisco Bay Trail, part of which runs along the Craneway wharf. Orton was asked to respond by Dec. 14. According to the letter, the restriction of public access to the Bay Trail violates the “December 9, 2004 Ground Leases between Ford Point, LLC and the City and Agency for the Craneway and submerged lands (‘Ground Leases’).”
Orton said he wrote back immediately to ask for “clarification of some of their statements.”
“The letter is wrong, it’s too bad they put it out,” Orton said. “This is not the direction we need to go in.”
Orton said he has been negotiating with the National Park Service to provide space for a visitor’s center for the Rosie the Riveter World War II/Home Front Historical National Park. The agreement between Orton and the city requires the center be located in the 40,000-foot Craneway in the Ford Building, and the letter states Orton has chosen to “rent all available space in the Ford Building and has not made the Craneway available to NPS.”
Orton said that the Oil House, a building adjacent to the Craneway would be a better fit for the center than the expansive Cranehouse. Housing the visitor’s center at the Oil House would fulfill the contractual obligation that 10,000 feet of space be given to the Park Service for the visitor’s center.
Orton said he’s hopeful the project can be completed within 12-24 months, with the Oil House as the likely site of the center.
Park superintendent Martha Lee said she thinks the center will probably be located in the Oil House, from what she’s learned from the Park’s negotiations with Orton. Lee said the Oil House would be a good place because, since it would not be located inside the Craneway but in its own building, the Park Service can operate the center during hours it chooses.
But, she said “we don’t have a written agreement with the owner. Until we’ve reached the end of our negotiations, we can’t say for sure.”
Lee said the time frame for completion of the project proposed by Orton works fine for the Park Service, and said she’s optimistic a deal can be worked out in the near future.
“Orton has done an amazing job (in rehabilitating the Ford Plant),” she said, “and I’m sure he’s going to be a good partner as we move ahead with the visitor’s center.”
According to the letter from the city attorney, though “insufficient progress” has been made in developing the Oil House location, what the letter calls Orton’s “proposed alternative” to the Craneway.
The letter also highlights what it says is a failure to allow access to the portion of the Bay Trail that runs along the Craneway wharf. The letter states that, in installing iron gates across the Bay Trail that are locked at night, Orton is in violation of a 2006 permit issued by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) to Orton and the city. The BCDC regulates development along the San Francisco Bay shoreline.
According to the BCDC, there are apparent violations of the permit, which requires public access to the Bay Trail, and it is working with the city and Orton to come to a resolution. Alan Wolken, the city’s project manager for the rehabilitation of the Ford Building, said Orton and the city submitted a revised plan to the BCDC that includes plans to modify the gates to improve access to the Bay Trail, and calls for an old ferry boat and barge that need permits to be removed. The revised plan also asks that the gates be allowed to lock from 1-5 a.m.
Orton said the gates are an issue of “a balancing act between public access versus public safety,” and said the gates can be locked at night because of “crowd control and crime control.”
“It’s in Richmond city’s interest to make sure you wipe out crime that’s occurring and we open this fully over a period of time in an intelligent and safe way,” he said.
Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.
Please send news tips to email@example.com.