Skip to content

Troubled tracks?

on October 23, 2009

Max Rivera can’t shake the memory.

As he lay in bed during the wee hours of Aug. 15, Rivera heard a commotion. The sounds of rustling and some voices – maybe distressed voices – drifted into his small bedroom from out near the railroad tracks a few paces behind his home.

Rivera thought about going out to check, but he didn’t. The noises weren’t out of the ordinary. Ever since he had moved his family in a few years earlier, late-night mischief had been the norm in the rocky, garbage-strewn area behind his house.

But this time would turn out to be something more than mischief.

“I always think, what if I could have done something,” Rivera said, standing in his backyard, just a few paces from the tattered yellow police tape that had hung there over a month. The creases on the sides of his eyes deepened in a pained expression.

Max Rivera, 67, has only a chain-link fence separating his family from the railroad tracks less than 15 yards away.

Max Rivera, 67, has only a chain-link fence separating his family from the railroad tracks less than 15 yards away.

Six people have been killed on the railroad’s land or in Rivera’s northeast Richmond neighborhood between Feb. 3 and Oct. 17. Two of them were children.

The death that haunts Rivera was that of Kevin Barrera, 14. The boy’s battered and shot body was found around dawn on Aug. 15, just off the railroad tracks south of the corner of Sanford Avenue and Cherry Street, just a few yards behind Rivera’s house. No arrests have been made.

The small bungalows around Shield Reid Park are home to a predominantly Latino community.  Mexican flags  fly from many porches.

The railroad tracks bend through, cushioned on both sides by weed-tangled, garbage-strewn dirt.

There is no wall between the homes and the tracks, no fence of any kind restricting access. People traipse through the broad landscape freely and frequently.

Residents say that the lack of a wall separating tracks from nearby homes makes them vulnerable in the event of derailment.

Residents say that the lack of a wall separating tracks from nearby homes makes them vulnerable in the event of derailment.

“This whole area, all this land, is always causing us trouble,” said Rivera, whose small house has about 15 yards between its property line and the tracks. “We need a wall here to be safe.”

Rivera worries about two potential dangers.

“People dump trash and God knows what else, they graffiti, there is even killings,” he said. “That’s what we deal with here every day, but what if one of the trains falls off the tracks and spills some chemicals? What happens to us?”

Rivera has found a sympathetic ear in one city agency.

“It was tragic what happened to that boy,” said Diane Gatewood of Barrera’s killing. Gatewood is an agent in the Office of Neighborhood Safety, which was created about two years ago to intervene in neighborhood gang disputes before they turn violent. “I was at that scene, he was found right next to the tracks and everybody around was really shaken up.”

Gatewood wants Union Pacific to better manage the land that she said is a factor in local crime.

But she acknowledged that getting the railroad to pony up resources is unlikely.

“The solution is that Union Pacific needs to fence that area off,” Gatewood said. “The tracks are used for freight, and the danger of derailments is always there, which is just added to crime and loitering that is already a problem.”

Weathered police tape still clings to a chain-link fence more than one month after it roped off the scene of a homicide.

Weathered police tape still clings to a chain-link fence more than one month after it roped off the scene of a homicide.

On a breezy September afternoon, remnants of crime scene police tape fluttered against weeds and a chain-link fence near the railroad.

Tires, spray cans, electronics and other wastes dotted the landscape.

Graffiti covers a cinderblock wall on the southern border. The wall encircles a building.

Tom Lange, a spokesman for Union Pacific, the railroad company that owns the land, said signs and other terrain features typically warn pedestrians to stay off the private property for their own safety.

As for whether a wall or fence may be a solution, Lange said he was not aware of any community or city inquiries about the issue.

“If nobody is even asking us the question, then the answer is no,” Lange said of possibly installing a barrier. “But if somebody came to us, then there is a lot we have to consider. We would look at the situation through all the different angles, see what options may exist.”

Police in Richmond say they are hampered by the maze of railroad tracks that crisscross through the city.

Most are active. Some are idle relics of the city’s industrial origins.

“It’s a constant challenge for us, sure,” said Officer Phillip Sanchez, who patrols the Iron Triangle, a section of the city that owes its name to the tracks that compose its boundaries. “We simply can’t pursue into a lot of these areas, we can’t drive into them because of the terrain, and a lot of times the guys we’re chasing know that.”

The likelihood of Union Pacific undertaking an effort to construct new barriers may be slim, especially since the railroad tracks were laid through the area decades before new home construction crept closer.

The railroad’s Lange suggested the responsibility lies with the city, not the railroad.

“If Union Pacific had done something on its property to alter the landscape of the community, we would evaluate what we might need to do in terms of mitigation,” Lange said. “In the majority of cases such as this, however, it is the city’s responsibility to implement mitigation efforts such as fences and walls for businesses and residences that elect to develop around active railroad operations.”

Rivera disagrees, and said he plans to pressure the railroad into investing in its neighbors’ safety.

Rivera said he plans to help organize a petition drive among his neighbors declaring they want the railroad to build a wall.

Gatewood is skeptical that an equitable solution can be struck between neighbors, city officials and the railroad.

“Will the railroad do something?,” Gatewood said. “I don’t know, I think it might take an act of Congress.”


  1. mark wassberg on April 21, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    That picture you are looking at is the every top of the “Iron Triangle”

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Card image cap
Richmond Confidential

Richmond Confidential is an online news service produced by the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism for, and about, the people of Richmond, California. Our goal is to produce professional and engaging journalism that is useful for the citizens of the city.

Please send news tips to

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top