Evacuation of local animal rescue group following October wildfires reveals challenges for animal shelters

  • left arrow
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • right arrow

After drawing a tube of blood from the front left leg of Diana, an 8-year-old American bulldog, outreach coordinator John Fonseca commended her as she laid on the bench at the adoption center of Milo Foundation, an animal rescue group based in Point Richmond.

“You did good, Diana,” Fonseca said.

Bethany Sullivan, Diana’s foster parent, was constantly caressing the dog’s abdomen. Although Sullivan’s own dog was sitting on the ground a couple of yards away, the deep concerns on her face might make you think that she had kept Diana for years, instead of a few days.

Most families may spend some time deciding what animal to foster as a temporary house guest, but when Sullivan visited the shelter last Sunday, she knew she had to rescue one, anyone.

What she did wasn’t only fostering a homeless dog: It was a contribution to the shelter’s disaster response efforts.

“I was ready and willing to take one of those animals that needed to be fostered to make room,” Sullivan said. “I know they had to evacuate their sanctuary up north that was affected by the fires.”

Apart from the adoption center in Point Richmond, Milo Foundation has a sanctuary near Willits, California. Lynne Tingle, founder and director, purchased the property in 1993 and has used the rural setting and ample space to house animals that are more behaviorally challenged and less likely to be adopted or fostered.

“They need a more specific kind of home, so it takes a little longer [for them to be adopted or fostered],” Tingle said. “They’re at least having quality of life, and we can keep trying to get them a home that is appropriate for their needs.”

Fonseca described the sanctuary as a “boarding school,” providing a less stimulating environment for undisciplined animals to “mellow out a little bit,” making them more approachable and adoptable.

At 3:30 in the morning of October 16, Tingle was woken up by a phone call from a former manager: The wildfires were coming toward Willits.

After failing to contact staff at the sanctuary, she immediately decided to drive up north, followed by staff members and volunteers. “It was really bizarre driving through. It looked very apocalyptic and unreal,” said staff member Holly Baroni, who arrived two days later. “It was almost like a movie.”

According to Tingle, the team evacuated more than 170 animals in total. Staff member Amanda Davis, who has been working for Milo Foundation for five years, said she had never experienced anything like that before.

“We couldn’t even tell who the dogs were. We didn’t know who we’re grabbing,” Davis said. “We were just grabbing and trying to go.”

Fires didn’t hit the sanctuary, but Davis ended up sleeping in her truck that night so that she was closer to the animals in case of emergency.

Fostering and adoptions started immediately at the scene, but space was still needed at the adoption center back in Point Richmond to accommodate the rest of the displaced animals. According to Fonseca, about 75 fosters were made in 12 hours thanks to volunteers and community members from all over the Bay Area.

Sullivan, an Oakland resident, picked up Diana a week later.

 

The burden of going “no-kill”


Still wearing a muzzle on her head, Diana looked weak and exhausted after the blood test. Although she also had some stitches removed on her abdomen and back legs as a result of surgical cysts and lymphomas removal, Diana was lucky.

According to Sullivan, Diana was on the verge of being euthanized at an animal control shelter in Merced County before being picked up by Milo Foundation, which labels itself as a “no-kill” shelter.

“No-kill” means that a shelter doesn’t put down healthy or treatable animals due to lack of space and only euthanizes those that are terminally ill or considered a threat to public safety.

In order for many shelters across the country to keep the “no-kill” status, they need to maintain the live release rate above 90 percent, meaning that nine of every 10 animals get to leave the shelter alive.

Sanctuaries that offer lifetime care for homeless animals aren’t uncommon, but running a spacious one in the hills to address overcrowding is rather unique for an adoption center. It’s a service beyond the reach of most urban adoption centers.

According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), approximately 1.5 million animals are euthanized in shelters nationwide every year, a decrease from about 2.6 million in 2011.

Despite the recent positive signs, director Tingle still remembers the horrifying scenes she witnessed while rescuing animals in the Central Valley region in the late ’90s.

“There would be big piles of euthanized dogs on the ground in the back of the shelter, ready to be burned up in the incinerator. It was just gruesome,” Tingle recalled. “You would definitely feel like you’re going in there and playing god, knowing that if I didn’t take them that day, maybe two days later they would be dead.”

California was one of the first states that tried to alleviate overpopulation in shelters and encourage the concept of “no-kill,” when lawmakers passed a series of bills in 1998. The state is still setting precedents to push for animal welfare in shelters to this day.

Last month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 485, which requires pet stores to sell dogs, cats and rabbits obtained from shelters or rescue groups — instead of from breeders and puppy mills — starting from January 2019, making California the first state to pass such legislation.

The bill can potentially ease the overabundance of animals in shelters. However, it does not prohibit breeders from selling animals directly to individuals.

Fonseca said the legislative move is a positive development, but it will take some time before people get fully on board with it, partly due to concerns regarding the source of animals offered by shelters.

“There are a lot of breeders who are in it for the self-benefit and willing to throw away animals if they don’t produce results, which is sales and dollars,” Fonseca said. “The thing that people don’t realize is if a litter of puppies is born, a few of them get adopted and a few others don’t. When they become older, they become useless because they’re trying to sell puppies.”

In other words, puppies produced by the puppy mill supply chain can become future liability for shelters.

 

A not-so-ideal stopover in the journey


Tingle and staff members are currently in the process of transferring animals back to their Willits sanctuary after receiving permission from the local sheriff. Overcrowding is not something Milo Foundation would be worried about, thanks to the sanctuary up north, but the adoption center in Point Richmond still has to provide shelter, food and daily care for about 50 dogs and a fair number of cats every day.

The noisiest and most hectic space here is the “main ward,” a room containing dozens of cubicles used to house adult dogs. Although staff members wipe the floor and clean each cubicle on a daily basis, urine and feces odor still lingers.

All the dogs are fed twice and taken out for exercise at least three times a day, but staff member Baroni said the environment in a shelter is still probably the most stressful for dogs.

“The barking and the noise, in general, is overwhelming for them,” Baroni said. “It’s very possible for dogs to develop behavioral issues in a shelter. It’s bit of a cycle because that makes them harder to adopt out.”

Fonseca, on the other hand, said that, for homeless animals, this is just a momentary “stopover in the journey.”

“I just try to encourage people to see this is a temporary respite. It’s not ideal, but we’ve all been there,” Fonseca said. “If you went to college, you probably had a dorm room that wasn’t ideal and then one day you grow up and you get a nice house.”

 

Guests from Texas


Every time strangers step in, or another dog is walked back after rotation, fierce barking fills the air in the main ward. Jasmine, a 6-year old brown mastiff, seemed oblivious to all the reactions. She just knocked over a bowl full of food, which didn’t seem to interest her at all.

“She doesn’t like it,” said staff member Clare Davis.

Jasmine is one of the 38 dogs taken by Milo Foundation during the Hurricane Harvey relief efforts in September.

After Hurricane Harvey hit and paralyzed Houston, Milo Foundation contacted an animal rescue group based in Austin, which has been the country’s largest no-kill city for almost six years. The group was trying to transfer as many adoptable dogs as possible to make room for evacuees, since euthanasia was against the “no-kill” status.

“The basic goal was to take animals to deviate the overcrowding that was going to happen in the local shelters so that the local community could rectify their circumstance,” Fonseca said.

Emily Schneider, director of media and communications at ASPCA, a national nonprofit experienced in assisting local shelters in evacuating and transferring animals during disaster response, said that since there’s no one organization overseeing relocations for animals in times of disaster, the process takes lot of collaboration among different rescue groups and shelters.

According to Schneider, destinations of these transfers are largely determined by their network and contacts, the receiving shelter’s ability to house additional animals and the likelihood of adopting these animals out.

“Relocation is really about giving homeless animals the best chance of finding safe and loving homes,” Schneider said.

Lying on a blanket inside her cubicle, Jasmine cast her eyes down and wrinkled the top of her head. She is still taking medication for her heartworm condition, a parasite prevalent in the South that may lead to serious illness. All adult dogs received by Milo Foundation tested positive for heartworm.

“The medication does make them look very lethargic and tired,” Baroni said. “That’s how she looked ever since she came in, unfortunately. She does look shut down and depressed.”

Jasmine is the only dog from Texas left in the adoption center two months after finding herself in California.

Baroni said it’s hard for her to watch some of the animals stuck in a shelter whether it’s because of the stigmatized breed or not being able to make an appealing first impression in front of people.

“The less time an animal spends in the shelter, the better,” Baroni said.

Post a comment

Richmond Confidential welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Richmond Confidential assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content. For concerns about comments posted to this site, please contact us at news@richmondconfidential.org

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*
*